Attentato terroristico ad Oslo.

visitatore · July 25, 2011, 9:18am

link alle 1500 pagine?

e1ke · July 25, 2011, 9:21am

http://media2.corriere.it/corriere/content/2011/pdf/2083-Declaration-Independence.pdf

Void · July 25, 2011, 9:23am

merda, fa paura solo a scrollarlo

PhantamaN · July 25, 2011, 9:26am

spero soltanto che la risposta della società sia altrettanto meticolosa.

dark_10 · July 25, 2011, 9:27am

E' un pazzo...

e1ke · July 25, 2011, 9:28am

3.149 The Bible and self-defence

Many Christians claim that acts of self-defence are unbiblical, unscriptural and ungodly. However, they are un-doubtfully wrong.
The Bible couldn't be clearer on the right, even the duty; we have as Christians to selfdefence.
Let's start in the Old Testament.

Exodus 22:2"If a thief be found breaking up, and be smitten that he die, there shall no
blood be shed for him,"

we are told in Exodus 22:2. The next verse says,

"If the sun be risen upon him, there shall be bloodshed for him; for he should make full restitution; if he have nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft."

In other words, it was perfectly OK to kill a thief breaking into your house. That's the ultimate expression of self-defence. It doesn't matter whether the thief is threatening
your life or not. You have the right to protect your home, your family and your property, the Bible says.
The Israelites were expected to have their own personal weapons. Every man would be summoned to arms when the nation confronted an enemy. The people defended
themselves.

Samuel 25:13: ”David said to his men, "Each of you gird on his sword." So each man girded on his sword. And David also girded on his sword, and about four hundred men went up behind David while two hundred stayed with the baggage.”

Every man had a sword and every man picked it up when it was required.

Judges 5:8: "They chose new gods; then was war in the gates: was there a shield or spear seen among forty thousand in Israel?"

Reminds us of what happens to a foolish nation that chooses to disarm. The answer to the rhetorical question is clear: No. The people had rebelled against God and put away their weapons of self-defence.

Psalms 144:1: "Blessed be the LORD my strength which teacheth my hands to war, and
my fingers to fight,"

Clearly, this is not a pacifist God we serve. It's God who teaches our hands to war and our fingers to fight. Over and over again throughout the Old Testament, His people are commanded to fight with the best weapons available to them at that time. And what were those weapons? Swords.
They didn't have firearms, but they had side-arms. In fact, in the New Testament, Jesus commanded His disciples to buy them and equip them.

Luke 22:36: "Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one."

Matthew 26:52-54: "Then said Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword into his place: for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword. Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels? But how then shall the scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be?"

If you read those verses in context they support the position of self-defence. Jesus told Peter he would be committing suicide to choose a fight in this situation, as well as
undermining God's plan to allow Jesus' death on the cross and resurrection. Jesus told Peter to put his sword in its place – at his side. He didn't say throw it away.
After all, He had just ordered the disciples to arm themselves. The reason for the arms was obviously to protect the lives of the disciples, not the life of the Son of God. What Jesus was saying was: "Peter, this is not the right time for a fight."
In the context of cultural conservative Europeans current war against the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist elites and the ongoing Islamic invasion through Islamic
demographic warfare against Europe, every military action against our enemies is considered self defence. There will be much suffering and destruction but eventually we
will succeed and may be able to start rebuilding. We should recall Nehemiah, who rebuilt the walls of Jerusalem.

Nehemiah 4:17-18: "Those who were rebuilding the wall and those who carried burdens took their load with one hand doing the work and the other holding a weapon”. ”As for the builders, each wore his sword girded at his side as he built,…”

Questo è solo un piccolo estratto del suo pensiero, il primo che ho trovato, ma è pieno.
Il suo attacco lui lo inscrive nella difesa dell'europa, dal poco che ho capito, riuscendo a giustificarlo ai suoi occhi.
Provo a vedere se c'è qualche paragrafo specifico che giustifica gli attacchi dal punto di vista religioso (anche se già in questo estratto, come ho detto, si può notare).

Void · July 25, 2011, 9:30am

è una definizione riduttiva e un pò fuorviante.
Per pazzo, nel linguaggio comune, intendiamo spesso qualcuno non in possesso delle proprio facoltà.
Questa persona sapeva esattamente cosa stava facendo, con molta più lucidità di quanta noi ce ne mettiamo in molte delle cose che facciamo

e1ke · July 25, 2011, 9:32am

Cazzo Kalidor, come ipotizzavo ieri in pm, ha tirato fuori anche il Deuteronomio.
Troppo lungo da incollare, ma sono i paragrafi:

More information about Christianity and self-defence
God will anoint you with his power to go into battle
God will give you his strength, boldness and courage to walk with his anointing
God will go before you to fight your battles

visitatore · July 25, 2011, 9:35am

ma come hanno fatto ad arrestarlo?

e1ke · July 25, 2011, 9:40am

Si è fatto arrestare.
Ne parla in questo paragrafo: "Avoiding apprehension/arrest and death"

As a consequence of this reality, a Justiciar Knight does not put restraints on himself.
You put restraints on yourself because you think it’s still hope; hope to get out of it alive or free.
This leads to hesitation, reluctance, confusion, delay and unnecessary danger and increases the risk of failure. The core strength of a Justiciar Knight is that we accept the fact that we’re already dead. In a way, this makes us partly
immortal. How can we die when we are already dead?
The sooner you accept that, the sooner you will be able to function as a soldier is supposed to function: without mercy, without hesitation, without compassion and without remorse. All war depends upon it. Fear is poison in combat, something everyone feels but try to suppress. If you allow fear to paralyze you, you will fail. You cannot allow this as it is destructive and even contagious.
Have no doubt about it; you will get caught or you will die. Just get used to that idea and you will finally be able to fully function as a fearless Knight, as a devastating tool of war. Because only a truly fearless soldier carries within him the ability to inflict massive ideological damage on any of the EUSSR regimes.

Ma soprattutto, si è fatto arrestare perché voleva farsi arrestare:

Altro paragrafo delirante sull'arresto:

C'è tutta la parte dedicata al processo, ai giudici, a come affrontarlo dal punto di vista ideologico e tantissima altra roba.

Un estratto da uno dei paragrafi che ho citato prima:

God will anoint you with his power to go into battle If you are operating under a full surrender with God the Father, and walking in all of God's ways and staying out of any serious sins and transgressions against Him - then the next thing you will need to fully realise is that God will now anoint you with His power if you are forced to go into battle with your enemy.
The Bible tells us that we are now all good soldiers of Jesus Christ. Whether we want to face up to it or not, we are all living in a war zone as a result of the curse of Adam and Eve that is still in full operation on this earth. Anyone of us at anytime can come under human or demonic attack. The daily news will prove that to you without any shadow of a doubt.

Each Christian must now make their own personal decision on all of this. You can either choose to learn how to rise up in the power of your Lord and Saviour and learn how to become a true warrior in the Lord, or you can continue to keep your head in the sand and oppressor after oppressor keep beating you down. The choice is yours.

The following verses will show you that God can anoint you with His power to defeat any enemy that may come your way - but you first have to be willing to step into that
anointing, and then be willing to take your enemy head on before God will release His anointing through you to be able to defeat that enemy.
Again, study these verses very carefully - as they will show you the incredible supernatural power that God can channel through you if you would be willing to step into
and walk with His anointing.

Erazor · July 25, 2011, 9:47am

sta andando tutto come previsto, da solo ha fatto la strage pianificata e il suo pdf meticolosamente scritto si sta diffondendo

"Your arrest will mark the initiation of the propaganda phase."

Spero solo che nessun altro folle abbia la voglia di leggersi 1500 pagine

visitatore · July 25, 2011, 9:48am

ma come si è fatto arrestare? ha ucciso tutti e poi ha aspettato l'arrivo della polizia?

ma con questo materiale come possono fargli un processo?

per me hanno sbagliato a pubblicare tutta questa roba, è proprio quello che lui voleva

PhantamaN · July 25, 2011, 9:51am

Infatti, col suo arresto comincia la fase della propaganda. Per questo, secondo me, la punizione perfetta per questo pezzo di merda sarebbe l'oblio più tetro e nero possibile immaginabile. Gli annienterei ogni traccia di vita sociale, ripristinerei tutto come era prima e poi perchè no lo lascerei libero (controllato) in modo che possa realizzare che nulla è cambiato dopo la sua "missione". Che chiunque lo veda o ci parli debutti col "scusi ma ci conosciamo?"
Poi vediamo se diventa pazzo davvero nel rendersi conto che tutto ciò che è e che vuol essere è semplicemente l'indifferenza.

Feror · July 25, 2011, 9:51am

con un tipo del genere dovresti semplicemente buttare nel cesso tutte le garanzie costituzionali e farlo semplicemente "sparire"

e1ke · July 25, 2011, 9:53am

Illuso, ci sarà sicuramente qualcuno che lo leggerà.
Ma spero di non averne la conferma tra qualche anno.
Tra l'altro è incredibilmente meticoloso tutto quanto, scandendo addirittura le fasi delle operazioni con determinate tempistiche.

Penso proprio che abbia aspettato l'arrivo della polizia, facendosi arrestare.
Dal suo punto di vista tutto è andato come voleva.
Sinceramente, è agghiacciante. Neanche nei film cazzo.

e1ke · July 25, 2011, 9:55am

Ha previsto anche la morte o lo sparire, diventerebbe un martire della causa.
Addirittura un paragrafo si intitola:

7e. A Perfect Knight fights even from the afterlife

They may physically kill a Justiciar Knight, but your name will be remembered for centuries. Your story will be told to future generations which will significantly contribute to the morale in the emerging Western European conservative resistance movement.

See 3.61 for more information.
You will forever be celebrated by your people as a martyr for your country, protecting your culture and fighting for your kin and for Christendom. You will be remembered as a conservative revolutionary pioneer, one of the brave European Crusader heroes who said; enough is enough, it is time to take back our countries before our multiculturalist traitor elites actually manages to finalize their agenda and sell us all into Muslim slavery.
Your sacrifice will be a great source of inspiration for generations of Europeans to come.
You will become a role model for hundreds, perhaps thousands of new emerging martyrs fighting the good fight, our fight. And when we seize political and military power in Europe within a few decades, it will be pioneers and historical pioneers like you who will be celebrated with reverence. Revolutionary patriots like the Justiciar Knights will then be celebrated as destroyers of Marxism and the slayer of tyrants; the fearless and selfless protectors of Europe, The Perfect Knights. For there is no greater glory than dying selflessly while pro-actively protecting your people from persecution and gradual
demographical annihilation.[...]

Drakkar · July 25, 2011, 9:56am

concordo

Nemo · July 25, 2011, 9:57am

Fa troppo ridere come questi giornalisti cerchino di alleviare la paura dell'ignoto delle cause con la ricerca spasmodica ed ossessiva dei "mi piace" della persona, ci manca anche la lista di cosa mangiasse e siamo a posto

visitatore · July 25, 2011, 9:58am

cazzo fermate tutto, non dobbiamo diffondere il libro di questo pazzo

damnatio memoriae, ecco cosa ci vuole

Lebannen · July 25, 2011, 10:00am

non è così facile. se ti butti in avanti devi avere prima due certezze:
1. di non essere il solo a farlo (ostacolo più grosso)
2. di avere una qualche possibilità di vittoria, altrimenti l'istinto di autoconservazione prevale

lui aveva 3 armi, per cui sicuramente la possibilità di fare fuori una prima ondata per intero, conscio di questo fattore nessuno si sarebbe mai fatto avanti per primo a dare il buon esempio.

feltri è l'esempio di come la buona dialettica può essere accompagnata da un ignoranza abissale dei meccanismi più basilari. mi stupisco di come sia ancora vivo anzichè morto alla maniera darwin award.