santa barbara dammi la forza che carta da culo.
1 Like
Se clicchi sul link il titolo migliora ancora 
Se leggi il testo poi…
Non esiste qualche mirror tipo corrierecancel per non regalare clic a quella carta da culo?
1 Like
Eccalla’
4 Likes
Tuttavia, la struttura del ragionamento resta collegata a Israele. Infatti, nel suo intervento lo Stato israeliano viene indicato come autore del genocidio denunciato, mentre il «sistema» viene descritto come l’insieme di attori e strumenti che lo avrebbero sostenuto o reso possibile. In questa costruzione logica il sistema non sostituisce Israele, ma viene definito in funzione dell’azione attribuita proprio a Israele.
Si vola altissimo, non l’ha detto ma evidentemente lo pensava 
vabe ma open (mentana) e’ pro israele con bias…quindi riportare qls cosa da parte di open o mentana su questo argomento e’ inutile se si vuole capire dove sta la verita’
ma non c’e’ un video completo cosi’ uno si fa un’idea e gg?
stamattina sono quasi arrivato alle mani con un collega per la questione albanese…
c’è il video sopra che avevo linkato
Eh ma l’articolo è di David Puente, che di professione si vende come “fact checker”, e infatti questo pezzo ha come tag sul sito “fact-checking”. È per quello che l’ho riportato, perché a quanto pare su Open “fact-checking” significa “dare la mia personale interpretazione dei fatti”
1 Like
si, recuperato.
beh non ha detto un cazzo contro il popolo, ha, giustamente, criticato il governo genocida.
siano inondati di sputi chi ha una posizione diversa, andiamo avanti e gg 
povera donna
1 Like
4 Likes
Al solito la stampa italiana riporta solo le cose che fanno comodo
Question: Yes. Steph. So, a fellow Frenchman, Foreign Minister Barrot is calling for the resignation of Francesca Albanese. Is the Secretary-General agreeing with that? What’s the Secretary-General’s…
Spokesman: Look…
Question: View on that?
Spokesman: Everyone has responsibilities, whether it’s the Secretary-General, Member States. As you know, special rapporteurs are appointed by the Human Rights Council by member States. If member States are not happy with what, one or more of the special rapporteurs are saying it is their responsibility to get involved in the work of the Human Rights Council, to get involved and push for the direction they wish to push for. We’ve always believed that the institution of special rapporteurs, while being completely separate from the Secretary-General, is an important part of the international human rights architecture. We don’t always agree with what they say, and that includes Ms. Albanese. But if the issue with special rapporteurs needs to be addressed by member States themselves.
Question: Steph, a follow-up please. Secretary-General’s predecessor, similarly, in his voice, criticized the rapporteur. Actually, it was Albanese’s predecessor. Why won’t Guterres do the same?
Spokesman: I mean, listen. Everyone has a lane in this organization. As I said, we don’t agree with much of what she says. We wouldn’t use the language that she’s using in describing the situation. She has a particular role. The Secretary-General has a particular role. I think you could do the compare and contrast yourself about their positions. But again, it is an issue for member States to address, if they have an issue with the special rapporteurs.
[…]
Question: Thank you, Stéphane. This is a follow-up on Benny’s question. Well, given that Francesca Albanese has denied making antisemitic remarks, and says her words were misinterpreted. Does the Secretary-General believe that in this case, she crossed the line or not?
Spokesman: Look. [cross-talk]
Question: And did he [cross-talk] listen the speech?
Spokesman: I’m not here to defend what she says or criticize what she says, right? She has a right, as a special rapporteur, to speak within her mandate. People have a right to criticize her. People have a right to support her, and if people are not happy with her work, there are mechanisms to address that and then the work of any other special rapporteur. I’m not here to be a commentator on what every special rapporteur says. We do believe that the institution of special rapporteurs is an extremely important one in terms of the global architecture. And there are a number of special rapporteur mandates who’ve done a lot of work to shed lights on human rights situations throughout the world.
Question: I’m sorry, Stéphane, but because there is a video of that speech, everybody can go there and listen to her. So, my question is, did the Secretary-General, one, I mean, did he listen what she said, and does he think that was an antisemitic statement or not? It’s a simple question. Is a yes or no.
Spokesman: Just because a question is simple doesn’t mean the answer is simple, and I think I’ve answered your question to the best of my ability. Pan? You’d have to ask him.
Aggiungo che l’ufficio per i diritti umani delle Nazioni Unite, tramite la sua portavoce, si è invece espresso in supporto della Albanese
“We are very worried. We are concerned that U.N. officials, independent experts and judicial officials, are increasingly subjected to personal attacks, threats and misinformation that distracts from the serious human rights issues,” said U.N. human rights office spokesperson Marta Hurtado at a Geneva press briefing when asked about the statements by European governments.
2 Likes
anche con gratteri hanno fatto na porcata simile
giornalacci
Ma no, siamo arrivati anche noi alla spicciolata.
Immagina quanti cromosomi possa avere in eccesso uno che si dice “fact checker”.
2 Likes
per fortuna…
ora dimissioni di Tajani (nei sogni)
3 Likes