Per chiunque ritenga il riconoscimento dello Stato di Palestina un passaggio meramente dimostrativo, beh, perlomeno presuppone l’attivazione di principi giuridici legalmente appellabili per opporsi istituzionalmente a direzioni politiche di questo tipo.
altro articolo sul tema già trattato sopra…che merde :/
Il Corriere ora pubblicherà articoli strappalacrime sulle famiglie palestinesi dilaniate dalla brutalità di Israele, con interviste alle madri ecc, giusto?
natalie_portman_jugs.jpg
manco gli ebrei ascoltano… antisemiti!
Siamo nella timeline in cui Vance dice che i parlamentari israeliani sono “weird” comunque 
cmq ha ragione a dire che sono strani
https://www.timesofisrael.com/smotrich-on-saudi-normalization-no-thank-you-keep-riding-camels/
Smotrich on Saudi normalization: ‘No thank you, keep riding camels’
Netanyahu ordina stop all’iter delle legge sull’annessione
Il primo ministro israeliano, Benjamin Netanyahu, ha ordinato al governo di fermare l’iter della legge sull’annessione della Cisgiordania fino a nuove disposizioni. Lo ha riferito il sito di Haaretz. In precedenza il ministro degli Esteri israeliano, Gideon Sa’ar, aveva definito il voto della Knesset “una mossa politica dell’opposizione” per “cercare di mettere in imbarazzo il governo durante la visita del vice presidente Jd Vance”, mentre il presidente, Donald Trump, ha chiarito che l’annessione “non avverrà” e che, se Israele andasse avanti con i suoi piani, perderebbe tutto il sostegno degli Stati Uniti.
https://xcancel.com/DropSiteNews/status/1982326024097710553?t=sCu2VNZxTyVaR0EgG589CQ&s=19
Conduttore di MSNBC chiede alla press secretary di Biden se si pente di alcune delle cose che ha avuto da dire a proposito di Gaza. Le sue risposte: “era il mio lavoro” (e ok, ma il tipo le risponde giustamente “ora però parli per te”), “sono una donna di colore e gay e per me era molto importante essere lì”, “sono fiera del lavoro che ho fatto”.
Dalla newsletter di Haarerz
Senior Hamas official Khalil al-Hayya told Al Jazeera that the organization will enter new areas in the Strip to search for additional bodies of hostages that have not yet been found, adding that “Israel will not be given an excuse to resume the war.” Regarding Hamas’ disarmament, Al-Hayya said that “if the occupation ends, the weapons will pass into the hands of the state.”
Non mi ricordo se Hamas aveva già parlato del disarmo condizionato
madre di Cristo donami la grazia quando dice che è dispiaciuta 16 volte dio maiala sta palesemente recitando, il livello di psicapita è fuori scala
“heartbreaking”
“Io ho soltanto eseguito gli ordini” 
è esattamente la prima cosa che mi è venuta in mente 
UNIFIL per una volta trolla l’IDF
An Israeli military drone was shot down by the UN Interim Force in Lebanon during a routine surveillance mission in the Kafr Kila area yesterday.
According to the IDF, the drone had posed no threat to the UNIFIL observers, who opened fire on the device and downed it.
UNIFIL said yesterday that the drone flew over its patrol “in an aggressive manner.” It added that “the peacekeepers applied necessary defensive countermeasures to neutralize the drone.”
Se perlomeno le Nazioni Unite inizassero ad imporre all’IDF un costo economico e logistico per le loro attività di sorveglianza e monitoraggio attuando ritorsioni armate contro atti intimidatori intentati verso il personale UNIFIL sarebbe un progresso, motivo per cui vedo favorevolmente l’uso di personale malese, nepalese, pachistano ed indonesiano per questo ruolo, hanno una minor propensione alla passività ed un supporto dai loro governi dopo il massaco compiuto nella Striscia di Gaza.
Francamente non trovo probabile lo stesso si possa dire dei corpi d’interposizione europei.
Si è fatta intervistare da Isaac Chotiner ed è andata esattamente come potete immaginare 
You lay out very clearly why you think Donald Trump is a threat to democracy. And, at the same time, you are suggesting that what happened in those three weeks was so serious that you had to leave the Democratic Party, even at this moment of grave threat. You said that the Party was trying to undermine Biden. What do you think they were doing and why?
Well, I mean, I just laid it out. I just said that there was an obvious campaign. You just had to watch.
Sure, but why were they doing that?
Because they believed that he needed to step aside. There’s more to this than just that period of time. This is very layered, right? There’s a period of time that I questioned what was happening and how do we treat our own, how do we treat people who are decent people? And then you also have to think about how I’m thinking about this as a Black woman who is part of the L.G.B.T.Q. community, and living in this time where I also don’t think Democrats right now, Democrats’ leadership, is protecting vulnerable people in the way that it should.
Sorry, I’m not trying to be dense. I’m a little unclear about what this has to do with Democratic leaders and many Democrats in the country thinking that Joe Biden was going to lose to Donald Trump—which was what the polls all showed—and therefore thinking that he should be replaced.
O.K., wait a minute. Hold on a second. Nobody knows anything. Nobody knows what would’ve happened. People also thought that if you replace Joe Biden we were going to win, or have a better chance of winning. Millions of people who showed up in 2020 didn’t show up in 2024. We can’t forget that there was an incumbency issue as well. This is real. There are, like, several G-10 countries with incumbents who did not get reëlected. There was an incumbency issue as well.
I’m not sure what you’re saying.
No, no, no. Wait a minute. You are saying that this was their thinking, and they were kind of predicting. But nobody knew what was going to happen. Nobody knew that Joe Biden was going to win in 2020. Nobody knew what was going to happen in 2024. People believed in their hearts that Kamala was going to win. They believed it. They saw the polling and they thought she was going to win, looking at the polling. Nobody knew anything. I’m only bringing up the polls because you brought up the polls to me.
So you have no concern, even to this day, that Joe Biden could serve as President through January, 2029?
I did not see anything that would’ve given me concern.
But you watched TV like the rest of us, right?
You write in the book, “He was just as defiant in his interview with [George] Stephanopoulos, though some nameless Democrats criticized that appearance too, saying it failed to ease their concerns.” This interview occurred after the debate, but before he dropped out. I went back and watched that interview. This was one answer he gave: “I, uh—I prepared what I usually would do, sitting down as I did, come back with foreign leaders or National Security Council for explicit detail. And I realized about partway through that, you know, all—I get quoted the New York Times had me down, at ten points before the debate, nine now, or whatever the hell it is. The fact of the matter is, that what I looked at is that he also lied twenty-eight times. I couldn’t, I mean, the way the debate ran, not—my fault, no one else’s fault—no one else’s fault.” When I watched that, I thought, This man should not be President for four more years. It doesn’t mean I think Donald Trump should be President, but I’m a little surprised that you don’t see what so many people, including so many Democrats, saw.
I’m not the only person who feels this. I’m just the one speaking very loudly. I’m the person who’s saying the quiet thing out loud.
Non so perché questa gente continui a cascare nella trappola di farsi intervistare da lui ma di sicuro sono contento che lo facciano perché cristo santo